One of the critical features in scientific research is the application of the so-called peer-review process before a scientific paper is officially published in a journal. Ideally, peer-review, at least seemingly in its original purpose, should serve as a measure of quality control that benefits both the authors and the readers. However, nowadays, it becomes more and more like an obstruction to the advancement of science, in particular, in terms of radically new ideas and directions.
English backup of my blog at wanpengtan.com. Topics include open science and new physics of mirror matter theory.
Saturday, October 10, 2020
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
A possible solution to arbitrary evaluations
My letter to Physics Today was just published in its issue in October, 2024 . Hopefully, it’ll draw attention from a wider audience to the i...
-
My letter to Physics Today was just published in its issue in October, 2024 . Hopefully, it’ll draw attention from a wider audience to the i...
-
Based on the earlier paper “ A Robust Community-Based Credit System to Enhance Peer Review in Scientific Research “, we will present more qu...
-
My paper titled “ New pairing mechanism via chiral electron–hole condensation for non-BCS superconductivity ” has just been accepted for pub...